Jardin notes that Virgin is thinking about what gets cached on planes. I would note that the idea of onboard media and caching servers is a great one, because it means that passengers could ostensibly stream or purchase downloadable digital content; and that whenever an airplane lands, its servers could automatically suck in at 802.11n speeds from a gate-mounted access point all the latest data to cache, including video.
On the cost of fuel to carry the Wi-Fi gear—probably a total of 200 pounds of dead weight and drag, based on information that Aircell and others have been giving out—I may have been close tot the mark when I suggested it was $50 for a cross country flight a few days ago.
The excellent Scott McCartney, author of The Middle Seat column in The Wall Street Journal, ran down the numbers on 10-June, and he says LAX-JFK costs about $500 per passenger when all the costs are figured out. But that includes all fuel divided by average passenger count: that is, the weight of the plane, everything in it, and its drag are all contributors.
That means that an added couple of passengers due to the availability of Wi-Fi; their willingness or the overall willingness to pay slightly more for the flight (which would be even fuller if more people want on); and the airlines’ cut of a dozen or sessions per flight could clearly outweigh the gas cost.
Changed Your Commute to Save Gas? You May Save on Insurance, Too
Singapore Airlines offers iPod, iPhone integration
Aircell Gets Rave Advance Review